|
|
ARTICLES & NEWSLETTERS |
|
Published Articles and
News You Can Use -- |
|
Back Issues
of our Business Appraisal Newsletter |
|
504 Grove Avenue - P. O. Box 9 - Parma, Idaho
83660
(208) 722-7272
|
|

|
|

PUBLISHED ARTICLES:
|
| Editor's Column -- "Does
a Historical Average, Weighted or Otherwise, Constitute an Income
Forecast?" by Paul R. Hyde, EA, MCBA, ASA, MAI. Published
in Business Appraisal Practice: Journal of The Institute of
Business Appraisers, Inc., Winter 2007/2008, p. 2 - 7. |
|
| Editor’s Column – “Business
vs. Real Estate Cap Rates” by Paul R. Hyde, EA, MCBA, ASA, MAI.
Published in Business Appraisal Practice: Journal
of The
Institute
of
Business
Appraisers, Inc., Fall 2007, p. 2 – 3.
|
|
| Editor’s Column - “Using
Relevant Economic Data” by Paul R. Hyde, EA, MCBA, ASA, MAI.
Published in Business Appraisal Practice:
Journal of The
Institute
of
Business
Appraisers, Inc., Spring 2007, p. 2 – 3.
|
|
| Editor’s Column – “Valuations
for Divorce”
by
Paul R. Hyde, EA, MCBA, BVAL, ASA, MAI.
Published in Business Appraisal Practice:
Journal of The
Institute
of
Business
Appraisers, Inc., Winter 2006/2007, p. 2 – 3. |
|
“An
Average of Historical Earnings is Not a Forecast” by Paul R. Hyde,
EA, MCBA, ASA, MAI. Published
in IBA News, Fall 2006, p. 3.
|
Editor’s Column – “Litigation
and the Limited Report” by
Paul R. Hyde, EA, MCBA, BVAL, ASA, MAI.
Published in Business Appraisal Practice:
Journal of The
Institute
of
Business
Appraisers, Inc., Fall 2006, p. 2 – 3.
|
Editor’s
Column – “Machinery & Equipment Appraisals:
How Can the Value be Different” by Paul R. Hyde, EA, MCBA, BVAL,
ASA, MAI. Published in Business
Appraisal Practice: Journal of
The
Institute
of
Business
Appraisers, Inc., Summer 2006, p. 2 – 4.
|
Editor’s Column – “Quantifying
Discounts for 50% Interests”
by Paul R. Hyde, EA, MCBA, BVAL, ASA.
Published in Business Appraisal Practice:
Journal of The
Institute
of
Business
Appraisers, Inc., Spring 2006, p. 2 – 9.
|
Editor’s Column – “Updated Levels of Value Chart”
by Paul R. Hyde, EA, MCBA, BVAL, ASA.
Published in Business Appraisal Practice:
Journal of The
Institute
of
Business
Appraisers, Inc., Summer/Fall 2005, p. 2 – 4.
|
Editor’s Column – “Valuing Businesses With Real
Estate Components” by Paul R. Hyde, EA, MCBA, BVAL, ASA.
Published in Business Appraisal Practice:
Journal of The
Institute
of
Business
Appraisers, Inc., Spring 2005, p. 2 – 7.
|
“Book
Reviews for Business Appraisers: The Handbook of Business Valuation
and Intellectual Property Analysis” by Shawn M. Hyde, CBA.
Published in Business Appraisal Practice:
Journal of The
Institute
of
Business
Appraisers, Inc., Spring 2005, p. 48.
|
Editor’s Column – “Suggestions for the Selection of a
Baseline Marketability Discount for Holding Companies”
by Paul R. Hyde, EA, MCBA, BVAL, ASA.
Published in Business Appraisal Practice:
Journal of The Institute of Business Appraisers, Inc., Winter
2004-2005, p. 2 – 5.
|
“Dealing
with a 50% Interest: Should an Adjustment for Control Apply?”
by Shawn M. Hyde, CBA. Published in Business Appraisal Practice:
Journal of The Institute of Business Appraisers, Inc., Winter
2004-2005, p. 47 – 53.
|
Editor’s Column – “WACCy
Problems: When is the Use of
a Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) Appropriate?” by Paul R.
Hyde, EA, MCBA, BVAL, ASA. Published
in Business Appraisal Practice: Journal
of The Institute of Business Appraisers, Inc., Fall 2004, p. 2 – 3.
|
Editor’s
Column – "Why Do We Include an Economic and Industry Section in Our
Appraisal Reports?"
by Paul R. Hyde, EA, MCBA, BVAL, ASA.
Published in Business Appraisal Practice:
Journal of The Institute of Business Appraisers, Inc., Summer
2004, p. 2 – 3.
|
Editor's Column: "When
to Use the Public Guideline
Company Method" by Paul R. Hyde, EA, MCBA, BVAL, ASA.
Published in Business Appraisal Practice: Journal of The Institute of
Business Appraisers, Spring/Summer 2004, p. 2 - 6.
|
Editor's Column: "Operating
Companies with Real Estate" by Paul R. Hyde, EA, MCBA, BVAL,
ASA. Published in Business Appraisal Practice: Journal of The
Institute of Business Appraisers, Winter 2003-2004, p. 2 - 5.
|
|
"In Support of Unsupportable Rates" by Paul R. Hyde,
EA, MCBA, BVAL, ASA and Shawn M. Hyde, CBA. Published in Business
Appraisal Practice: Journal of The Institute of Business Appraisers,
Fall 2003, p. 32 - 35.
|
Editor's Column: "Forecasting Net Cash Flow" by
Paul R. Hyde, EA, MCBA, BVAL, ASA. Published in Business Appraisal
Practice: Journal of The Institute of Business Appraisers, Fall 2003,
p. 2 - 3.
|
Editor's Column: "A
Newsletter or Discussion Idea" by Paul R. Hyde, EA, CBA,
BVAL, ASA. Published in Business Appraisal Practice: Journal of
The Institute of Business Appraisers, Summer 2003, p. 2 - 3.
|
Editor’s
Column: “An
Invitation to You to Submit an Article”
by Paul R. Hyde, EA, CBA, BVAL, ASA, Editor.
Published in Business Appraisal Practice:
Journal of The Institute of Business Appraisers, Spring 2003 p. 2.
The Institute of Business Appraisers, Inc.
Post Office Box 17410, Plantation, FL 33318.
|
“One
Point Does NOT Define a Line – One Method Does NOT (Usually)
Constitute an Appraisal”
by Paul R. Hyde, EA, CBA, BVAL, ASA, Editor.
Published in Business Appraisal Practice:
Journal of The Institute of Business Appraisers, Spring 2003 p.
24-26.
The Institute of Business Appraisers, Inc.
Post Office Box 17410, Plantation, FL 33318.
|
"Explaining
the Alphabet Soup: Business Appraisal Designations -- What They Mean and
How Difficult They are to Obtain" by Paul R. Hyde, EA, CBA, BVAL, ASA.
Published in Business Appraisal Practice: Journal of The Institute of
Business Appraisers, Spring 2002, p. 23 - 39.
|
|
"Pricing Tips for Mini-Self Storage Units"
by Paul
R. Hyde, EA, CBA, BVAL. Published in The 2001 Business Reference Guide,
Business Brokerage Press, 2001, p. 574.
|
"Discounts and Premiums: A Chart to Illustrate
Them More Clearly" by Paul R. Hyde, EA, CBA, BVAL. Published in
Business Appraisal Practice: Journal of The Institute of Business
Appraisers, Fall 2000, p. 22 - 24.
|
"Dealing with 'Skimming
Sellers'" by Paul R. Hyde, EA, CBA, BVAL. Published Spring 2000 Issue of IBBA News, p. 5 - 6.
Professional Journal of the International Business Brokers Association, Inc.
|
|
INDEX TO
ISSUES OF NEWS YOU CAN USE:
(Click on the Item You
Want to See)
|
|
|
| Capitalization
Rates and Risk
- August 2008 |
|
| Business
vs. Real Estate Cap Rates -
July 2008 |
|
| Business
Exit Strategy Planning
- June 2008 |
|
| Precision
vs. Accuracy
- May 2008 |
|
| Lease
Issues and Business Value
-
April 2008 |
|
| S
Corp Valuations & Gross v. Commissioner
-
March 2008 |
|
| Valuing
Professional Practices
-
February 2008 |
|
| Conservation
Easements
-
January 2008 |
|
| How
to Select a Professional
- December 2007 |
|
| Why
Are Appraisal Reports So Thick?
- November 2007 |
|
| Is
a Site Visit Really Necessary?
- October 2007 |
|
| Common
Appraisal Errors
- September 2007 |
|
| Fair
Value Update
- August 2007 |
|
| Canned
Computer Valuation Programs
- June 2007 |
|
| Precision
vs. Accuracy
- May 2007 |
|
| Risk
vs. Reward
-
April 2007 |
|
| Business
vs. Real Estate Cap Rates
- March 2007 |
|
| Goodwill:
What is it?
- February 2007 |
|
| Real
Estate in Business Valuations
- January 2007 |
|
| Fair
Market Value & Synergy
- December 2006 |
|
| Estate
& Gift Tax – When is an Appraisal
Really
Necessary?
- November 2006 |
|
Valuations
for Divorce
-
October
2006
|
Highest
and Best Use
- September 2006
|
Public
Comparables for Private Companies?
- August 2006
|
|
How
to Handle Large, Unusual Risks
- July 2006
|
Does
One Point Define a Line?
- June 2006
|
Let’s
Talk About Dates
- May 2006
|
An
Average of Historical Earnings is
Not a Forecast
-
April 2006
|
Machinery
& Equipment Appraisals:
How
Can the Value be Different?
- March 2006
|
|
What
Does This Mean?
- February 2006
|
What
is a Business Really Worth?
- January
2006
|
Hold
‘em or Fold ‘em?
- December 2005
|
Developing a
Realistic Forecast vs. Dream Sheets
- November 2005
|
Using a Third
Appraiser to Solve Differences
- October 2005
|
Buy-Sell
Agreement Problems
- September 2005
|
Subsequent
Events:
The Appraisal Date Matters!
- August 2005
|
(Out
of) Control Premiums and Discounts - July 2005
|
See the Big Picture
- June 2005
|
Defining
the Appraisal Assignment
- May 2005
|
Business
vs. Real Estate:
Cap Rate Problems
- April 2005
|
Appraisal
Diagnosis - March 2005
|
Undivided
Interest Appraisal Problems - February 2005
|
Appraisals:
Is the Cheapest Really the Best - January 2005
|
Appraising
the Appraisal - December 2004
|
Business
and Commercial Damages - November 2004
|
Coordinating
Business & Asset Appraisals - October 2004
|
Fourth
and Long for Minority Stock? - September 2004
|
Public
Comparables for Private Companies? - August 2004
|
Economic
and Industry Analysis - July 2004
|
Market
Data - June 2004
|
The
Method Behind the Madness: Why Discounts Exist - May 2004
|
When
Should the Public Guideline Company Method Be Used? - April 2004
|
Ball
Park Estimates Strike Out - March 2004
|
Return
on Investment: Risk vs. Reward -
February 2004
|
Company
Owns Real Estate? Be Careful! - January 2004
|
Is
There a "Fair Market?" - December 2003
|
Commodity
vs. Professional Services - November 2003
|
Family
Business Values - October 2003
|
Economic
Outlook - September 2003
|
Valuation
Quotes - August 2003
|
|
Business
and Commercial Damages -- July 2003
|
Fair
(Market) Value? -- June 2003
|
|
Computer
Valuation Programs -- May 2003
|
Valuation
"Experts" Testimony Excluded -- April 2003
|
|
Personal
and Professional Goodwill -- March 2003
|
The
Role of the Third Appraiser -- February 10, 2003
|
Compensation
in Divorce -- January 13, 2003
|
Occasionally
You Can Have Your Cake and Eat it Too! ESOPs --
December 11, 2002
|
Confusion
Regarding Goodwill -- November 18, 2002
|
Bills
Get Paid With Cash, NOT ‘Earnings’
-- October 14,
2002
|
Sure,
we lose $5 on the sale of each item, but we’ll make it up on the volume! --
September 16, 2002
|
One
Point Does NOT Define a Line – One Method Does NOT Constitute an
Appraisal -- August 12, 2002
|
Rebutting
Unreasonable Appraisals -- July 15, 2002
|
Have
You Valued a Dallas Diamond Dealer for Divorce? -- June 17, 2002
|
The
Geeks Shall Inherit the Earth -- May 13, 2002
|
Runs,
Hits and Enrons -- March 18, 2002
|
Master
Limited Partnerships -- February 11, 2002
|
Irrelevant
Appraisal Issues -- January 21, 2002
|
Excedrin
Headaches #141 and #142: Valuing Goodwill and Intangible Assets
-- December 17, 2001
|
Back
to Basics: Standards of Value
-- November 15, 2001
|
How
Long Should a Business Appraisal Take? -- October 15, 2001
|
What
is "Cash Flow?" -- September 17, 2001
|
|
Stock
vs. Asset Sales -- August 13, 2001
|
Buy-Sell
Agreements: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly --
July 16, 2001
|
Selecting
a Business Appraiser -- June 2001
|
Stock
Options for Private Companies? Whoa! -- May 2001
|
|
Understanding
Discounts for Lack of Control
-- April 2001
|
Valuation as
of When? -- March 2001
|
An ESOP Fable --
February 2001
|
How
Much Does Debt Really Cost? -- January 2001
|
Discounts
and Premiums -- December 2000
|
Discounts
and Premiums: A Chart to Illustrate Them More Clearly
-- Referenced in December 2000 Letter
|
Review
of Business Appraisal Reports -- November 2000
|
FLP/LLC
Valuation Discounts Redux: Know When to Hold 'Em, and When to Fold 'Em
-- October 2000
|
Buy-Sell
Agreement Problems -- September 2000
|
Appraising
Appraisal Designations -- August 2000
|
Court
Cases Court Trouble for Appraisers -- July 2000
|
How
to Value Very Small Businesses -- June 2000
|
Dealing
with "Skimming" Sellers - May 2000 ( Article written for &
published by IBBA News)
|
Who
Wants To Be an IPO Millionaire? -- April 2000
|
The
Toughest Part of Business Appraising: The Multiple -- March
2000
|
Price
Negotiations: Ready, Fire, Aim! -- February 2000
|
Who Values Businesses?
-- January 2000
|
|
Industry
Experts or Business Appraisers -- December 1999
|
How
Much Appraising is Enough? -- November 1999
|
Information Known or
Reasonably Knowable -- October 1999
|
Justification
of Purchase: A Key Appraisal Tool -- September 1999
|
Rates and
Multiples: Define Them! -- August 1999
|
Double Counting! --July 1999
|
How
Long is a Business Appraisal Good For? -- June 1999
|
Valuing Stock Options
|

August 2008
Capitalization
Rates and Risk
Last month, I discussed the difference between
business and real estate capitalization “cap” rates.
As a follow up to the topic of cap rates, I thought it would be useful to
discuss cap rates and how they relate to risk.
This is easiest when discussing real estate, but the same principles
apply in business cap rates and discount rates.
Again, just what is a cap rate and what does
it measure? A cap rate represents
the percentage applied as a divisor to a one-year income stream that is
indicative of the value that both a typical buyer and seller would agree upon.
In simple terms, it is the rate that a buyer requires for both the annual
income from a property plus the profit, (typically from appreciation), and what
the buyer expects from an eventual sale of the property.
It is critically important to realize that the cap rate includes both
annual income and anticipated future appreciation!
Cap rates change over time based on overall economic conditions, national
and local, and they are particularly influenced by prevailing rates of return on
alternative investments as well as the perceived risk associated with the
specific real estate property.
A number of factors should be considered when
selecting a cap rate to be applied to a specific property in order to obtain an
indication of value. It is not
simply enough to look at cap rates from the sale of other properties in the same
category as the property in question, however, this is often all that is done in
practice. In order to understand how
this should work, looking at an example will be helpful.
Let’s assume we are valuing a small
neighborhood shopping center with 10,000 square feet of building – five
tenants each with 2,000 square feet of space, built last year, and located on a
busy street in a nice town across from a Wal-Mart.
The “subject” is fully leased with one national tenant, one national
franchise restaurant (local franchisee), and three “mom and pop” local
businesses. Each lease is for five
years and is at “market” rent.
The following are a number of “comparable”
sales that could be used to extract a capitalization rate that would be
considered applicable to our subject:
 | An older medium sized shopping center with
35,000 square feet of building space in an old area of town with 25%
vacancies. A cap rate determined
by dividing the net operating income by the sales price for the center of
14%. |
 | A 5,000 square foot restaurant building
three blocks away leased to a national restaurant chain for 20 years.
A cap rate determined by dividing the net operating income by sales
price for the building of 6.5%. |
 | A 15,000 square foot neighborhood shopping
center built seven years ago on a good street in a city twenty miles away
with seven tenants on month-to-month leases.
A cap rate determined by dividing the net operating income by the
sales price of 9%. |
 | A regional shopping center in a city twenty
miles away with a cap rate determined by dividing the net operating income
by the sales price of 7%. |
 | A 20,000 square foot neighborhood shopping
center built twenty-five years ago three miles away on a less busy street
with a mixture of lease expiration dates and most leases with rents
considerably less than market rates. The
center has not been well maintained, but due to its low rents, it is
ninety-five percent occupied with a cap rate determined by dividing the net
income by the recent sales price of 10.5%. |
If these are all of the sales that have
occurred in the last year or so, it may be all of the information available.
What is the appropriate cap rate for the subject?
A tough question.
To further complicate things, cap rates that
are extracted from sales are based on the income and expenses associated with
each sale. It is important to
consider the vacancy rate used and whether or not the expenses used to arrive at
each cap rate included all appropriate expenses or whether they may have been
higher than normal for a number of reasons.
Often, there are a number of unknowns involved which could result in
differences in cap rates derived from sales comparables.
The selected capitalization rate used to value
a property is driven by the risk associated with achievement of the expected
income stream. Factors that
influence the risk are the quality of tenants, the length of leases, the
relationship of rents to current market rents, i.e. are the rents above the
market rate? (If so, the tenant may be looking for ways out of the lease).
Are the rents below the market rate?
(If so, how long are the leases? Are
the leases assignable?) What is
happening in the area? Many
more factors are often considered as well.
Once the capitalization rate has been
selected, its suitability can be checked by a technique called the Band of
Investment approach. This
methodology involves the use of typical rates of return on equity and available
financing for similar properties. If
the indications of a suitable capitalization rate vary significantly from the
capitalization rate extracted from the market, it may mean that additional
considerations are warranted to see if perhaps the extracted rate should be
adjusted.
The capitalization rate is very sensitive.
A small change in the cap rate results in a large difference in the
indication of value. For this
reason, it is wise to use both a cost approach and a sales comparison approach
to support the value conclusion reached using the income approach.
The appraiser’s judgment and experience greatly influences the quality
of virtually all valuation conclusions reached.
Valuations play a part in all strategic
transactions, tax, and many litigation matters. For additional information or
advice on a current situation, please do not hesitate to call.
We value both real estate and businesses
including machinery & equipment.

July 2008
Business
vs. Real Estate Cap Rates
It is not uncommon to see an inexperienced
business appraiser, particularly one who has a real estate background or is
familiar with commercial real estate properties, use a real estate
capitalization rate to value a business entity.
When this occurs, the business is typically significantly
overvalued.
For many years it seems like the
capitalization rate (cap rate) that was used for many real estate commercial
properties was ten percent. It is
still used as a “rule of thumb” by many real estate brokers and property
owners. Over the last few years, we
have seen cap rates in many real estate appraisals drop significantly from this
old bench mark resulting in higher values. Now
as real estate financing has tightened up, cap rates are rising resulting in
somewhat lower values as investors are demanding higher returns.
Just what is a cap rate and what does it
measure? A cap rate represents the
percentage applied as a divisor to a one-year income stream that is indicative
of the value that both a typical buyer and seller would agree upon.
In simple terms, it is the rate that a buyer requires for both the annual
income from a property plus the profit, (typically from appreciation), and what
the buyer expects from an eventual sale of the property.
It is critically important to realize that the cap rate includes both
annual income and anticipated future appreciation!
Cap rates change over time based on overall economic conditions, national
and local, and they are particularly influenced by prevailing rates of return on
alternative investments as well as the perceived risk associated with the
specific real estate property.
The income stream used |